Louisa Starmer

Disturbing a Church Service, 24th July 1862

The Rev. — Wilson, vicar of the parish of Desborough, charged Louisa Starmer with disturbing the service at church.

—Mr. Wilson stated that on the morning of the 24th of July he was engaged at the parish church in the solemnization of a marriage. There was a large number of persons in the church-yard at the time. This woman appeared to him to have put her mouth to the key-hole of the chancel-door, and shouted loudly into the church, but he could not distinguish what she said. The noise, however, had the effect of disturbing the service, and he was obliged to stop until quiet was restored. He heard like noises from two other doors of the church being the same voice, and he believed defendant went from one door to another, which she could effect in a very short time. Did not see her, but knew her voice well, and was quite sure it was her voice that he heard through the chancel and other doors.

John Deacon, carpenter, and sexton of the parish church, said that on the morning of the 25th of July he was in the church-yard. There were a great many persons in the church-yard at the time. Saw defendant standing close to the chancel door. Heard her cry out loudly, "Good morning," and he sent her away. Was close to her, and was quite certain it was she who cried out.

Jonathan, son of the former witness, gave similar evidence.

—Defendant said there was a rather singular wedding at the time, and she had promised the bridal party that whenever the matrimonial knot was about to be tied she would wish them "Good morning." She was sure she meant no harm by it, and also sure she did not put her mouth to the chancel door. She was exceedingly sorry if she had done wrong, and would take care never to do so again.

Jane Page and another female witness, for defendant, deposed to being in the church-yard and hearing her say "Good morning" to the bride and bridegroom, but did not see her put her mouth to the key-hole of the door.

—The rev. gentleman said he had no wish to press for a conviction, but the frequent annoyances he had met with during religious services determined him to endeavour to put a stop to such indecorous proceedings.

—The defendant, being called upon to pay 11s. 6d. expenses, burst into a flood of tears, and said, "O what shall I do, I have no money, and what is to become of my dear children."

—The kind-hearted vicar paid the expenses himself.

 Northampton Mercury, Saturday 30 August 1862