You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Frier > Sarah Frier (1868 - )

Desborough People
Sarah Frier

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   10116 1.0 Sarah Frierfemale

Birth: about 1868, at Burton Latimer, NorthamptonshireWW1 Army

Pedigree
   4282
Married: Charles William Burton  about 1890BMD
b. about 1872, at Wootton, NorthamptonshireCensus

   101172.1 William Thomas Burtonmale
Birth: 1891, at DesboroughBMD
Death: 18 Jun 1917, Died of wounds, age: 26y
Burial: at Military Cemetery, Lijssenthoek, Belgium (ref: XV. F. 13.) MI

Additional information: Army Service ( - 18 Jun 1917)

   101182.2 Robert Henry Burtonmale
Birth: about 1893, at Southwell, NottinghamshireCensus
Baptism: 16 Sep 1894 at DesboroughIGI

   101192.3 Florence Burtonfemale
Birth: about 1897, at Southwell, NottinghamshireCensus

   101202.4 Beatrice Burtonfemale
Birth: about 1899, at Nottingham, NottinghamshireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page