You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Monk > James Monk (1833 - )

Desborough People
James Monk

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   1019 1.0 James Monkmale
1013 Father: Samuel Monk    bap. 20 Mar 1803 at Desborough
1014 Mother: Ann [not known]    b. about 1805 at Desborough
Baptism: 27 Nov 1833 at DesboroughIGI

Pedigree
   61
Married: Martha Marks  1855BMD
b. about 1832, at Welton, NorthamptonshireCensus

   11242.1 Elizabeth Monkfemale
Birth: about 1853, at Welton, NorthamptonshireCensus

   11252.2 John Monkmale
Birth: about 1856, at DesboroughCensus

   11262.3 David Monkmale
Birth: about 1857, at DesboroughCensus

   22892.4 Fanny Monkfemale
Baptism: 09 Aug 1861 at DesboroughIGI

   22902.5 Emma Monkfemale
Birth: about 1864, at DesboroughCensus

   22912.6 Henry Monkmale
Birth: about 1868, at DesboroughCensus

   22922.7 Alfred Monkmale
Birth: about 1870, at DesboroughCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page