You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Panter > Anthony Panter (1654 - )

Desborough People
Anthony Panter


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   10227 1.0 Anthony Pantermale

Birth: before 1654Est. from child

Married: Elizabeth [not known]  before 1672Est. from child
b. before 1654Est. from child

   102292.1 Thomas Pantermale
Burial record: The edge of the page where the date would be is missing, but it is later than 7th May
Baptism: 01 Jul 1672 at Desborough (source reads 'Thomas the Son of Anthony Panter and Eliza: his wife') Parish Reg
Burial: Jul? 1672, aged Infant, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Thomas the son of Anthony Panter buried an Infant') Parish Reg

   106192.2 [male] Pantermale
Birth appears between 4th June and 16th July in the Parish Register
Birth: -- 1676, at Desborough (source reads: A Son of Anthony Panter born not baptized by me) Parish Reg

   104242.3 Thomas Pantermale
May not be attached to the correct family
Baptism: 05 May 1681 at Desborough (source reads 'Thomas the Son of Anthony Panter') Parish Reg



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page