You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Essam > Caroline Essam (1831 - )

Desborough People
Caroline Essam


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   1065 1.0 Caroline Essamfemale
1070 Father: Hugh Essam
1071 Mother: Elizabeth [not known]

Married: Thomas Blissett  1855BMD

   52853.1 Minnie Esther Blissett   also known as Esther Minnie Blissettfemale

   178384.1 Leslie Hornsbymale

   178394.2 Alice Hester Hornsbyfemale

Additional Information: Inquest

   178644.3 Arthur Hornsbymale

   52863.2 Walter Samuel Blissett   also known as Samuel Blissettmale

   98153.4 Lizzie Blissettfemale

   98163.5 Ralph Blissettmale

   98173.6 Evelyn Blissettfemale

   52833.2 Fanny Blissettfemale

   52843.3 Elsie Blissettfemale

   98003.4 Gertie Blissettfemale

   169173.6 May Blissettfemale

Additional Information: BMD Announcements

   169183.7 Ivy Blissettfemale

   10692.4 Fanny Blissettfemale

   34832.5 Arthur Blissettmale



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page