Desborough People
Mary [not known]
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
11212
1.0 Mary [not known]female
Buried 9 days after her daughter Mary's baptism
Birth: before 1703
Est. from child
Burial: 23 Jan 1721
/22 at St Giles, Desborough
(source reads 'Mary Wife of Joseph Slough')
Bp Transcripts DesbPedigree
11211Married:
Joseph Slough
before 1721
Est. from child
b. before 1703Est. from child
Possibly not attached to the correct William Thompson
Baptism: 14 Jan 1721
/22 at Desborough
(source reads 'Mary the Daughter of Joseph & Mary Slough')
Bp Transcripts Desb
Burial: 05 Sep 1789, aged c. 68y, at St Giles, Desborough
(source reads 'Mary Tomson widow')
Bp Transcripts Desb11372Married:
William Ling Tompson
at Desborough after Banns, 10 Oct 1743
(marriage source reads: By Banns William Thompson and Mary Slough)
Bp Transcripts Desb
bap. 11 Jun 1727 at Desborough
(source reads 'William Ling Son of Sarah Tompson')
Bp Transcripts Desb
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page