You are here: Desborough > Surnames > [not known] > Elizabeth [not known] (1722 - )

Desborough People
Elizabeth [not known]

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   11731 1.0 Elizabeth [not known]female

Birth: before 1722Est. from child

Pedigree
   11730
Married: William Carless  before 1740Est. from child
b. before 1722  bur. 02 Dec 1747, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads: beured William Carles)

   117322.1 Frances Carlessfemale
Baptism: 22 Feb 1740/41 at Desborough (source reads 'Frances Carless the Daughter of William Carless and Elizabeth his wife')Bp Transcripts Desb

   118012.2 William Carlessmale
Baptism: 15 May 1743 at Desborough (source reads 'William the son of William and Elizabeth Carless')Bp Transcripts Desb

   118742.3 Benjamin Carlismale
Baptism: 30 Nov 1746 at Desborough (source reads 'Benjaman Carlis son of William and Elizabeth is wife')Bp Transcripts Desb

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page