You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Lole > Joseph Lole (1741 - 1804)

Desborough People
Joseph Lole

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   11748 1.0 Joseph Lolemale
10966 Father: Edward Lole    bap. 15 Nov 1713 at Desborough    bur. 30 Jul 1779 at St Giles, Desborough
11747 Mother: Mary [not known]    b. before 1723
Baptism: 18 Oct 1741 at Desborough (source reads 'Joseph the Son of Edward Lole and Mary his wife') Bp Transcripts Desb
Death: 16 Aug 1804, age: 62yMI   memorial
Burial: 18 Oct 1804, aged 62y, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Thomas Lole aged 62') Bp Transcripts Desb

Pedigree

   132092.1 Benjamin Lolemale
Burial: 26 Jan 1788 at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Benjamin Lole Infant') Bp Transcripts Desb


   136832.2 Elizabeth Lolefemale
Burial: 16 Jun 1797 at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Elizabeth Lole infant') Bp Transcripts Desb

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page