You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Buttler > Elizabeth Buttler (1744 - )

Desborough People
Elizabeth Buttler

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   12284 1.0 Elizabeth Buttlerfemale

Birth: before 1744Est. from child

Pedigree
   12283
Married: Samuel Iliffe  at Desborough 24 Dec 1762 (marriage source reads: Samuel Iliffe and Elizabeth Buttler)Bp Transcripts Desb
b. before 1744  bur. 23 Jan 1770, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads: Saml Iliffe)

   123552.1 Hannah Iliffefemale
Baptism: 22 Jan 1764 at Desborough (source reads 'Hannah the Daughter of Saml Iliffe and Elizth his wife')Bp Transcripts Desb

   124602.2 Mary Iliffefemale
Baptism: 28 Nov 1765 at Desborough (source reads 'Mary the Dr of Saml Iliffe and Elizth his wife')Bp Transcripts Desb

   125312.3 Ann Iliffefemale
Baptism: 05 Feb 1768 at Desborough (source reads 'Ann the Daughter of Samll Iliffe')Bp Transcripts Desb

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page