You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Cox > William Cox (1764 - )

Desborough People
William Cox

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   12392 1.0 William Coxmale
11637 Father: Robert Cox   b. 03 Apr 1737 at Desborough
12182 Mother: Elizabeth Hoby   b. before 1740
Baptism: 04 Nov 1764 at Desborough (source reads 'William the Son of Robt Cox and Elizth his wife')Bp Transcripts Desb

Pedigree
   12347
Married: Esther Coe  at Desborough after Banns, 19 May 1788 (marriage source reads: Willm Cox and Esther Coe Both of this parish by Banns)Bp Transcripts Desb
b. 18 Sep 1763, at Desborough (source reads: Easther the Daughter of Wm Coe and Mary his wife)

   132272.1 Robert Coxmale
Baptism: 14 Sep 1788 at Desborough (source reads 'Robert, son of Willm and Esther Cox')Bp Transcripts Desb
Burial: 25 Nov 1788, aged c. 2m, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Robert Cox Infant')Bp Transcripts Desb

   133022.2 Robert Coxmale
Baptism: 19 Sep 1790 at Desborough (source reads 'Robert Son of Wm & Esther Cox')Bp Transcripts Desb

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page