You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Wright > Louisa Wright (1858 - )

Desborough People
Louisa Wright

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   12434 1.0 Louisa Wrightfemale
Father: Henry Wright
Mother: Louisa Spires
Birth: about 1858, at Deenethorpe, NorthamptonshireCensus

Pedigree
   12433
Married: John Thomas Jarvis  1881BMD
b. about 1856, at Stoke Albany, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1883, at Stoke Albany, NorthamptonshireCensus
5528
Married: Ellen Summerly  1908BMD
b. about 1887, at DesboroughCensus

   164893.1 John William Jarvismale
Birth: about 1910, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1884, at Stoke Albany, NorthamptonshireCensus
2660
Married: Fred Blissett  1904BMD
b. Mar 1881, at DesboroughCensus

   164903.1 Frederick Thomas Blissett   also known as Thomas Frederick Blissettmale
Birth: 1907, at DesboroughCensus
17475
Married: Maud Sarah Ann Beeby  1937BMD
b. 10 Jun 1908, at DesboroughCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page