You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Grane > Elizabeth Grane (1752 - )

Desborough People
Elizabeth Grane

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   12637 1.0 Elizabeth Granefemale

Birth: before 1752, at DesboroughEst. from marriage

Pedigree
   11867
Married: Thomas Jarvis  at Desborough 23 Oct 1770 (marriage source reads: Thomas Jarvis and Elizth Grane both of this parish) Bp Transcripts Desb
bap. 06 Jul 1746 at Desborough (source reads 'Thomas Garvis the Son of Henery Garvis and Mary is wife') Bp Transcripts Desb

   127582.1 Ann Jarvisfemale
Baptism: 23 May 1772 at Desborough (source reads 'Ann the Daughr of Thos and Elizth Jarvis') Bp Transcripts Desb
Burial: 14 Jun 1772, aged c. 3w, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Ann Jarvis Infant') Bp Transcripts Desb

   129152.2 Thomas Jarvismale
Baptism: 19 Jan 1777 at Desborough (source reads 'Thos Son of Thos & Elizabeth Jarvis') Bp Transcripts Desb

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page