You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Coe > Matthew Coe (1851 - 1912)

Desborough People
Matthew Coe


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   1274 1.0 Matthew Coemale
1264 Father: Edward Coe    bap. 15 May 1805 at Desborough    d. 14 Jan 1893 at Desborough
1265 Mother: Mary [not known]    b. about 1811 at Desborough
Birth: about 1851, at DesboroughCensus
Death: about 1912, age: 62yBMD

Married: Harriett Marlow  1872BMD
b. about 1855, at DesboroughCensus

   35892.1 Edmund Coemale
Birth: about 1874, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1876, at DesboroughCensus
Married: Frederick Samuel Bradley  1895BMD
b. about 1872, at Birmingham, WarwickshireCensus

   93773.1 Gladys May Bradleyfemale
Birth: about 1896, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 28 Jun 1896 at DesboroughIGI

   35912.3 Arthur Coemale
Birth: about 1879, at DesboroughCensus

   46652.4 Ellen Coefemale
Birth: about 1887, at DesboroughCensus



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page