You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Tomson > Mary Tomson (1749 - 1808)

Desborough People
Mary Tomson

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   12749 1.0 Mary Tomsonfemale

Birth: about 1749, at DesboroughDerived/Burial
Burial: 05 May 1808, aged 59y, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Mary Haseldine aged 59')Bp Transcripts Desb

Pedigree
   12048
Married: Thomas Haseldine  at Desborough 26 Dec 1772 (marriage source reads: Thos Haseldine and Mary Tomson Both of this parish)Bp Transcripts Desb
b. 03 Jun 1753, at Desborough (source reads: Thos the son Thos Haseldine and Elizth his wife)

   128312.1 Elizabeth Haseldinefemale
Baptism: 23 Apr 1774 at Desborough (source reads 'Elizth the Daughr of Thos and Mary Haseldine')Bp Transcripts Desb

   129422.2 William Hazeldinemale
Baptism: 07 Sep 1777 at Desborough (source reads 'William, Son of Thomas and Mary Hazeldine')Bp Transcripts Desb
Burial: 07 Sep 1777, aged c. 1d, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'William, Son of Thomas & Mary Hazeldine')Bp Transcripts Desb

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page