You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Groocock > George Burrows Groocock (1855 - 1925)

Desborough People
George Burrows Groocock


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   1323 1.0 George Burrows Groocockmale
221 Father: George Groocock    b. 05 Jun 1835 at Desborough    d. 01 Apr 1902 at Desborough
153 Mother: Hannah Feakin    b. 04 Mar 1835 at Desborough    d. 13 Jun 1881
Birth: about 1855, at DesboroughCensus
Death: 12 Feb 1925 , at Desborough, age: 70y
Probate: 07 Jul 1925  executors, etc

Married: Harriett Coe Martin  1880BMD
b. about 1853, at DesboroughBMD

   34932.1 Elizabeth Groocockfemale
Birth: about Aug 1880, at DesboroughCensus

   47932.2 Edith Groocockfemale
Birth: about 1883, at DesboroughCensus
Married: Joseph Charles Coe  1906BMD
b. about 1879, at DesboroughCensus

   47942.3 Phoebe Groocockfemale
Birth: about 1886, at DesboroughCensus

   92492.4 Mabel Groocockfemale
Birth: about 1895, at DesboroughCensus



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page