You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Cave > Catherine Cave (1783 - )

Desborough People
Catherine Cave

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   13767 1.0 Catherine Cavefemale

Birth: 1783, at DesboroughEst. from marriage

Pedigree
   13766
Married: William Henley  at Desborough by Licence, 14 Jan 1802 (marriage source reads: William Henley of the parish of Old in the County of Northampton and Catherine Cave of this parish by L.)Bp Transcripts Desb
b. 1783, at Old, Northamptonshire  d. about 1822

Parentage not yet proven
Birth: before 1800Est. from child

Additional Information: BMD Announcements
14834
Married: William Gibbon  at Desborough 22 Aug 1816Mercury
b. before 1780, at Kettering, Northamptonshire

   148363.1 Charles Iliffe Gibbonmale
Birth: about 1819, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus
Baptism: 21 Jun 1820 at DesboroughIGI

   148373.2 James Gibbonmale
Baptism: 21 Jun 1820 at DesboroughIGI

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page