You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Crutchly > Joseph Crutchly (1785 - )

Desborough People
Joseph Crutchly

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   13822 1.0 Joseph Crutchlymale

Birth: before 1785Est. from child

Pedigree
   13823
Married: Hannah [not known]  before 1803Est. from child
b. before 1774Derived/Burial

   138242.1 Ann Crutchlyfemale
Baptism: 06 Mar 1803 at Desborough (source reads 'Ann Daughter of Joseph and Hannah Crutchly') Bp Transcripts Desb

   138252.2 Lucy Crutchlyfemale
Baptism: 06 Mar 1803 at Desborough (source reads 'Lucy Daughter of Joseph and Hannah Crutchly') Bp Transcripts Desb

   139812.3 Joseph Crutchleymale
Baptism: 19 Sep 1811 at Desborough (source reads 'Joseph Son of Joseph & Hannah Crutchley') Bp Transcripts Desb

   139822.4 Rachel Crutchleyfemale
Baptism: 19 Sep 1811 at Desborough (source reads 'Joseph Son of Joseph & Hannah Crutchley') Bp Transcripts Desb

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page