Desborough People
Joan Lockewood
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
14179
1.0 Joan Lockewoodfemale
14121
Father:
Henry Lockewood
b. before 1571 at Desborough
bur. 17 Aug 1620 at St Giles, Desborough
11652
Mother:
Susanna Whittring
b. 30 Apr 1571 at Desborough
bur. 08 Jul 1635 at Desborough
Baptism: 06 Sep 1591 at Desborough
(source reads 'Joan d Harry Lockewood')
Rec. Off. Trans.
Burial: 28 Sep 1636, aged c. 45y, at St Giles, Desborough
(source reads 'Joan wife of John Walker')
Rec. Off. Trans.Pedigree
14178Married:
John Walker
at Desborough 17 Nov 1604
(marriage source reads: John Walker & Joan Lockewood)
Rec. Off. Trans.
b. before 1586Est. from marriage
Baptism: 24 Nov 1605 at Desborough
(source reads 'Anne d John Walker')
Rec. Off. Trans.
Baptism: 24 Feb 1607
/08 at Desborough
(source reads 'Mary d John Walker')
Rec. Off. Trans.
Baptism: 29 Oct 1615 at Desborough
(source reads 'Eliz d John Walker')
Rec. Off. Trans.
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page