You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Rea > Jane Rea (1857 - )

Desborough People
Jane Rea

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   14372 1.0 Jane Reafemale

Birth: 1857, at Detton, ShropshireCensus

Pedigree
   1042
Married: Albert Charles Baines  about 1878BMD
b. about 1855, at Desborough

   143732.1 William Albert Bainesmale
Birth: about 1878, at Aston, WarwickshireBMD

   143742.2 Catherine Bainesfemale
Birth: about 1880, at Aston, WarwickshireBMD

   143752.3 John A Bainesmale
Birth: about 1883, at Aston, WarwickshireCensus

   143762.4 Frederick H Bainesmale
Birth: about 1885, at Aston, WarwickshireCensus

   143772.5 Joseph C Bainesmale
Birth: about 1886, at Aston, WarwickshireCensus

   143782.6 Clarissa Bainesfemale
Birth: about 1888, at Aston, WarwickshireCensus

   143792.7 George T Bainesmale
Birth: about 1890, at Aston, WarwickshireCensus

   143802.8 Harold Bainesmale
Birth: about 1892, at Aston, WarwickshireCensus

   143812.9 Hubert B Bainesmale
Birth: about 1895, at Smethwick, StaffordshireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page