Desborough People
William Brette
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
14408
1.0 William Brettemale
Birth: before 1553
Est. from child
Burial: 18 Dec 1601 at St Giles, Desborough
(source reads 'Wm Brette - a day labourer')
Rec. Off. Trans.Pedigree
Burial: 14 Jun 1582 at St Giles, Desborough
(source reads 'Anne d Wm Brette')
Rec. Off. Trans.
Baptism: 15 Jan 1571
/72 at Desborough
(source reads 'Jane d Wm Brette')
Rec. Off. Trans.
Baptism: 05 Apr 1575 at Desborough
(source reads 'Richard s Wm Brette and John Brette (twins)')
Rec. Off. Trans.
Burial: 24 Aug 1585, aged c. 10y, at Desborough
(source reads 'Richard s Wm Brette')
Rec. Off. Trans.
Baptism: 05 Apr 1575 at Desborough
(source reads 'Richard s Wm Brette and John Brette (twins)')
Rec. Off. Trans.
Burial: 19 Apr 1575, aged c. 2w, at Desborough
(source reads 'John s Wm Brette')
Rec. Off. Trans.
Baptism: 28 Mar 1581 at Desborough
(source reads 'Agnes d Wm Brette')
Rec. Off. Trans.
Burial: 20 May 1581, aged c. 2m, at St Giles, Desborough
(source reads 'Agnes d Wm Brette')
Rec. Off. Trans.
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page