You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Sumpter > George Sumpter (1867 - )

Desborough People
George Sumpter

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   14662 1.0 George Sumptermale

Birth: about 1867, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus

Pedigree
   14663
Married: Mary Ann [not known]  before 1890Est. from child
b. about 1869Census

   100252.1 Hope Sumpterfemale
Birth: about 1890, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus
4664
Married: Walter Coe  at Rothwell, Northamptonshire 03 Feb 1916WW1 Army
b. about 1890, at DesboroughCensus

   146642.2 Eva Sumpterfemale
Birth: about 1892, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus
9433
Married: Alfred Whittering  at Rothwell, Northamptonshire 02 Apr 1915WW1 Army
b. about 1892, at DesboroughCensus

   146652.3 Violet Sumpterfemale
Birth: about 1897, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus

   146662.4 Lily Sumpterfemale
Birth: about 1898, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page