You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Linnell > John Stockburn Linnell (1865 - 1920)

Desborough People
John Stockburn Linnell

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   14723 1.0 John Stockburn Linnellmale

Birth: about 1865, at Arthingworth, NorthamptonshireCensus
Death: 1920, age: 55yMI   memorial
Burial: at Desborough Cemetery, DesboroughMI

Pedigree
   14724
Married: Mary Elizabeth Smith  about 1899BMD
b. about 1874, at Spalding, LincolnshireCensus

   147252.1 Grace Mary Linnellfemale
Birth: about 1900, at Leicester, LeicestershireCensus

   147262.2 John Robert Wallis Linnellmale
Birth: 1901, at Leicester, LeicestershireBMD
Death: 17 Jan 1976, age: 77yMI   memorial
Burial: at Desborough Cemetery, DesboroughMI

   147282.3 James Lawrence Linnellmale
James was entered in the 1911 census as deceased, then crossed out
Birth: 1902, at Leicester, LeicestershireBMD
Death: about 1903 , at Leicester, Leicestershire, age: under 1yBMD

   147272.4 Katherine Elizabeth Linnellfemale
Birth: about 1904, at Leicester, LeicestershireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page