You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Moore > Lucy Moore (1835 - )

Desborough People
Lucy Moore

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   14798 1.0 Lucy Moorefemale
14796 Father: John Moore    b. about 1804 at Thorpe Malsor, Northamptonshire
14797 Mother: Lucy [not known]    b. about 1804 at Thorpe Malsor, Northamptonshire
Birth: about 1835, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus

Pedigree
   
Married: John West   
Birth: about 1869, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus

Click Census Details link above for children not listed here
14795
Married: Louisa York  1891BMD
b. about 1872, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus

Not all children of the above parents are listed below. Click on Census Details links of father and/or mother for more

   100373.1 Winifred Miriam Westfemale
Birth: 1893BMD
5318
Married: Frederick Arthur Crick  at Rothwell, Northamptonshire 25 Dec 1915WW1 Army
b. about 1887, at DesboroughCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page