You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Dixon > Jane Dixon (1840 - )

Desborough People
Jane Dixon

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   14877 1.0 Jane Dixonfemale

Birth: about 1840, at Corby, NorthamptonshireCensus

Pedigree
   1099
Married: John Yeomans  1866BMD
b. 08 Nov 1835, at Desborough

   148782.1 Austin Yeomansmale
Birth: about 1867, at Corby, NorthamptonshireCensus

   148792.2 Mary Jane Yeomansfemale
Birth: about 1868, at DesboroughCensus

   148802.3 Robert Yeomansmale
Birth: about 1870, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus

   148812.4 Emily Yeomansfemale
Birth: about 1872, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus

   148822.5 Elizabeth Annie Yeomans   also known as Ann Yeomansfemale
Married Frederick Adcock 1899: BMD 1899 q2 Kettering v3b p466
Birth: about 1874, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireBMD

   148832.6 Rosina Yeomansfemale
Birth: about 1877, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page