You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Dawes > Francis Dawes (1586 - 1637)

Desborough People
Francis Dawes

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   15125 1.0 Francis Dawesmale

Birth: before 1586Est. from child
Burial: 15 Dec 1637 at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Francis Dawes - a poor old man') Rec. Off. Trans.

Pedigree

   154802.1 Thomas Dawesmale
Burial: 17 May 1607 at Desborough (source reads 'Thos s Francis Dawes') Rec. Off. Trans.


   151262.2 Mary Dawesfemale
Baptism: 16 Oct 1604 at Desborough (source reads 'Mary d Francis Dawes') Rec. Off. Trans.
Burial: 02 May 1606, aged c. 18m, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Mary d Francis Dawes') Rec. Off. Trans.


   153342.3 William Dawesmale
Baptism: 14 Apr 1609 at Desborough (source reads 'Wm s Francis Dawes') Rec. Off. Trans.
Burial: -- Sep 1609, aged c. 5m, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Wm s Francis Dawes') Rec. Off. Trans.

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page