You are here: Desborough > Surnames > [not known] > Lucisesse [not known] (1571 - 1603)

Desborough People
Lucisesse [not known]

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   15469 1.0 Lucisesse [not known]female

Birth: before 1571Derived/Parish Reg
Burial: 02 Dec 1603 at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Lucisesse* w Thos Gruffin') Rec. Off. Trans.

Pedigree
   14616
Married: Thomas Griffin 
b. before 1571

   146172.1 George Griffinmale
Baptism: 24 Mar 1589 /90 at Desborough (source reads 'George s Thos Griffin') Rec. Off. Trans.

   146392.2 Edmund Gruffinmale
Baptism: 12 Aug 1592 at Desborough (source reads 'Edmund s Thos Gruffin') Rec. Off. Trans.

   150692.3 Jane Gruffinfemale
Baptism: -- Jan 1599 /00 at Desborough (source reads 'Jane d Thos Gruffin') Rec. Off. Trans.

   150942.4 Thomas Gruffinmale
Baptism: 24 Jul 1602 at Desborough (source reads 'Thos s Thos Gruffin') Rec. Off. Trans.

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page