Desborough People
Catherine Selina Kilborn
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
1651
1.0 Catherine Selina Kilbornfemale
821
Father:
Thomas Kilborn
bap. 23 Aug 1830 at Desborough
d. 19 Jan 1864 at Desborough
Birth: about 1860, at Desborough
Census
Death: 13 Oct 1913
, at 18 King St, Desborough
Probate
Probate: 16 Apr 1820
executors, etc
Pedigree
614Married:
James Hawes
about 1881
BMD
b. about 1861, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1881, at DesboroughCensus
There is a Florence M Panter, death recorded, aged 7, in the same quarter as Florence Hannah, may possibly be her daughter
Birth: about 1883, at Desborough
Census
Death: about 1914, age: 31y
BMD4303Married:
Burditt Panter
about 1910
BMD
b. about 1884, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1885, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1888, at DesboroughCensus
Death: 15 Jul 1917
, at FranceDied Great War
Memorial: at Ypres, France (ref: Panel 56) CWGC
Birth: about Jul 1890, at Desborough
Census
Death: 1916, age: 25y
BMD
Birth: about 1893, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about Jun 1900, at DesboroughCensus
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page