You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Wallis > Harriet Wallis (1847 - )

Desborough People
Harriet Wallis

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   16741 1.0 Harriet Wallisfemale

Birth: about 1847, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

Pedigree
   6581
Married: George Buckby  1872 (marriage source reads: George Buckley and Harriet Wallis) BMD
b. about 1849, at DesboroughCensus

   167422.1 Emma Buckbyfemale
Birth: about 1873, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   167432.2 Clara Buckbyfemale
Birth: about 1875, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   167442.3 George Buckbymale
Birth: about 1877, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   167452.4 Ellen Buckbyfemale
Birth: about 1878, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   167462.5 William Buckbymale
Birth: about 1880, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   167472.6 Arthur Buckbymale
Birth: about 1881, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page