You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Robinson > Emma Robinson (1837 - )

Desborough People
Emma Robinson

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   16805 1.0 Emma Robinsonfemale

Birth: about 1837, at Denford, NorthamptonshireCensus

Pedigree
   16804
Married: Charles Beeby  1857BMD
b. about 1836, at Woodford, Northamptonshire

Not all children of the above parents are listed below. Click on Census Details links of father and/or mother for more

   58812.1 Charles Leonard Robinson Beeby   also known as Leonard Beebymale
Birth: about 1859, at Denford, NorthamptonshireCensus
5882
Married: Martha Jane Gunn  1885BMD
b. about 1867, at Denford, Northamptonshire

   58833.1 Charles Beebymale
Birth: about 1886, at Denford, NorthamptonshireCensus

   58843.2 George Beebymale
Birth: about 1888, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   58853.3 Florence Beebyfemale
Birth: about 1890, at DesboroughCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page