You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Loasby > Henry Loasby (1848 - )

Desborough People
Henry Loasby


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   17150 1.0 Henry Loasbymale

Birth: about 1848, at Cranford, NorthamptonshireCensus

Married: Caroline [not known] 
b. about 1850, at Clapton, NorthamptonshireCensus

Not all children of the above parents are listed below. Click on Census Details links of father and/or mother for more
Birth: about 1874, at Finedon, NorthamptonshireCensus
Married: Emma Amelia Ginns  1897BMD
b. about 1879, at DesboroughCensus

   171483.1 Mabel Evelyn Loasbyfemale
Birth: about 1898, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 28 Nov 1897 at DesboroughIGI

   171523.2 Ethel Loasbyfemale
Birth: about 1899, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   171533.3 Florrie Loasbyfemale
Birth: about 1903, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   171583.4 Walter Loasbymale
Birth: about 1906, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page