You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Peacock > Frederick Peacock (1871 - )

Desborough People
Frederick Peacock

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   17212 1.0 Frederick Peacockmale

Birth: about 1871, at Elstow, BedfordshireCensus

Pedigree
   2877
Married: Edith Marlow  about 1898BMD
b. about 1878, at DesboroughCensus

   172132.1 Thomas Peacockmale
Birth: about 1899, at Bedford, BedfordshireCensus

   172142.2 Arthur Peacockmale
Birth: about 1900, at Bedford, BedfordshireCensus

   172152.3 Sidney Peacockmale
Birth: about 1902, at Bedford, BedfordshireCensus

   172162.4 Hilda Peacockfemale
Birth: about 1903, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   172172.5 Ivy Peacockfemale
Birth: about 1904, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   172182.6 Nellie Peacockfemale
Birth: about 1906, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   172192.7 George Peacockmale
Birth: about 1909, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   172202.8 Horace Peacockmale
Birth: about 1910, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page