You are here: Desborough > Surnames > [not known] > Elizabeth [not known] (1834 - )

Desborough People
Elizabeth [not known]

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   17660 1.0 Elizabeth [not known]female

Birth: about 1834, at Sutton Bonington, NottinghamshireCensus

Pedigree
   17659
Married: William Doughty 
b. about 1831, at Sutton Bonington, NottinghamshireCensus

Not all children of the above parents are listed below. Click on Census Details links of father and/or mother for more
Birth: about 1861, at Sutton Bonington, NottinghamshireIGI

Additional information: Employment
1326
Married: (1) Mary Jane Groocock  about 1882BMD
b. 1860, at DesboroughMI

   176613.1 William H Doughtymale
Birth: about 1884, at DesboroughCensus

1658
Married: (2) Sarah Ann Coe  1891BMD
b. about 1865, at DesboroughCensus

   176623.2 George H Doughtymale
Birth: about 1893, at Kegworth, LeicestershireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page