You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Goodliffe > James William Goodliffe ( - )

Desborough People
James William Goodliffe


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   17746 1.0 James William Goodliffemale

Married: Meady Abbott  1895BMD
b. about 1872, at Polebrook, NorthamptonshireCensus

   177472.1 Emma Goodliffefemale
Birth: about 1896, at Pytchley, NorthamptonshireCensus

   177482.2 Elizabeth Goodliffefemale
Birth: about 1899, at Pytchley, NorthamptonshireCensus

   177492.3 William James Goodliffemale
Birth: about 1901, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   177502.4 Georgina Goodliffefemale
Birth: about 1903, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   177512.5 George Goodliffemale
Birth: about 1905, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   177522.6 Arthur Goodliffemale
Birth: about 1907, at DesboroughCensus

   177532.7 Frederick Henry Goodliffemale
Birth: about 1909, at DesboroughCensus



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page