You are here: Desborough > Surnames > [not known] > Frances [not known] (1760 - 1844)

Desborough People
Frances [not known]

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   17887 1.0 Frances [not known]female

Birth: about 1760Census
Burial: 02 Jul 1844, aged 84y, at All Saints, Rushton, NorthamptonshireNBI

Pedigree

Additional Information: Newspaper Article

Census Details: not at Desborough in 1841
   17886
Married: Abraham Dalby 

   69762.1 Abraham Daulbymale
Parentage presumed from 1816 news report
Birth: about 1789, at Rushton, NorthamptonshireCensus

Additional Information: Newspaper Article
17888
Married: (1) Hannah Lansbury  at Desborough by Licence, 29 Oct 1815 (marriage source reads: Abraham Dalby of Rushton, Hannah Lansbury of Desborough) Nhants PRs
b. before 1799, at DesboroughEst. from marriage

6977
Married: (2) Mary [not known] 
b. about 1789, at Daventry, NorthamptonshireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page