You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Haseldine > Elizabeth Haseldine (1754 - 1773)

Desborough People
Elizabeth Haseldine


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   2114 1.0 Elizabeth Haseldinefemale

Birth: before 1754, at DesboroughEst. from marriage
Burial: 30 Oct 1773 at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Elizth Frear')Bp Transcripts Desb

Married: Thomas Frear  at Desborough 05 Jun 1772 (marriage source reads: Thos Frear and Elizth Haseldine. Both of this parish)Bp Transcripts Desb
b. before 1754, at Desborough

   127612.1 Mary Frearfemale
Baptism: 07 Jun 1772 at Desborough (source reads 'Mary the Daughr of Thos and Elizth Frear')Bp Transcripts Desb
Burial: 10 Sep 1772, aged c. 3m, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Mary Frear Infant')Bp Transcripts Desb

   127982.2 Sarah Frearfemale
Baptism: 19 Aug 1773 at Desborough (source reads 'Sarah the Daughr of Thos and Elizth Frear')Bp Transcripts Desb



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page