You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Yeomans > George Henry Yeomans (1850 - )

Desborough People
George Henry Yeomans


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   2146 1.0 George Henry Yeomansmale
659 Father: John Yeomans    bap. 03 Sep 1821 at Desborough    d. 17 Feb 1893 at Desborough
896 Mother: Jane Coe    b. 06 Jun 1824 at Desborough
Birth: Jun 1850, at DesboroughCensus

Married: Margaret Ann Ward  1871BMD
b. about 1852BMD

   31132.1 Harriett Yeomansfemale
Birth: 1874, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: 1882, at DesboroughCensus
Married: Charles William Laundon  about 1903BMD

   171363.1 Dorothy Maud Laundonfemale
Birth: about 1904, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 03 Apr 1904 at DesboroughIGI

   171373.2 Mabel Laundonfemale
Birth: about 1906, at DesboroughCensus

   171383.3 Lily Laundonfemale
Birth: about 1908, at DesboroughCensus

   171393.4 Florence Laundonfemale
Birth: about 1909, at DesboroughCensus



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page