You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Cox > Hannah Cox (1812 - 1893)

Desborough People
Hannah Cox


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   2228 1.0 Hannah Coxfemale
2233 Father: William Cox   b. 09 May 1779 at Desborough
2234 Mother: Elizabeth Salmon   b. 20 Dec 1778 at Desborough
Birth: about 1812, at DesboroughCensus
Death: 1893, age: 81yBMD

Married: (1) Joseph Kendall  before 1832Est. from child
b. about 1806  d. 1843

   22292.1 Jane Kendallfemale
Baptism: 26 Nov 1832 at DesboroughIGI

   22302.2 Dorcas Kendallfemale
Birth: 05 Jun 1837IGI
Baptism: 26 Jun 1837 at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireIGI

   22312.3 Thirza Kendallfemale
Birth: about 1840Census

Married: (2) James Wells  1845BMD
b. about 1798, at Rothwell, Northamptonshire  d. about 1880, age: 82y

   163132.7 Caleb Wellsmale
Birth: about 1848, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus

   163142.8 Elizabeth Wellsfemale
Birth: about 1850, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireBMD



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page