You are here: Desborough > Surnames > [not known] > Elizabeth [not known] (1750 - 1810)

Desborough People
Elizabeth [not known]


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   2441 1.0 Elizabeth [not known]female

Birth: about 1750Derived/Burial
Burial: 08 Jul 1810, aged 60y, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Elizabeth Cave aged 60')Bp Transcripts Desb

Married: John Cave  before 1770Est. from child
b. before 1752

   24422.1 Elizabeth Cavefemale
Baptism: 21 May 1770 at Desborough (source reads 'Elizabeth the Daughter of John and Elizth Cave')Bp Transcripts Desb
Burial: 04 Jun 1773, aged c. 3y, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Elizabeth Cave')Bp Transcripts Desb

   24432.2 Thomas Cavemale
Baptism: 13 Jul 1774 at Desborough (source reads 'Thos the son of John and Elizth Cave')Bp Transcripts Desb
Burial: 22 Jul 1775, aged c. 1y, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Thomas Cave an infant')Bp Transcripts Desb



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page