You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Biddle > Sarah Biddle (1712 - 1731)

Desborough People
Sarah Biddle

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   2534 1.0 Sarah Biddlefemale

Birth: before 1712, at DesboroughEst. from marriage
Burial: 10 Apr 1731 at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Sarah the wife of Thomas Ward') Bp Transcripts Desb

Pedigree
   5099
Married: Thomas Ward  at Desborough 29 May 1730 (marriage source reads: Thomas Ward & Sarah Biddle both of this Parish) Bp Transcripts Desb
b. before 1697, at DesboroughEst. from marriage

   50982.6 Elizabeth Wardfemale
The burial record may relate to one of the Elizabeths who marries a Ward, rather than to this Elizabeth
Baptism: 28 Mar 1731 at Desborough (source reads 'Elizabeth the Daughter of Thomas Ward and Sarah his wife') Bp Transcripts Desb
Burial: 11 Mar 1772 at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Elizabeth Ward') Bp Transcripts Desb

 

Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page