You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Coe > William Coe (1879 - 1954)

Desborough People
William Coe

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   2807 1.0 William Coemale
1073 Father: Robert Coe    b. about 1858 at Desborough
955 Mother: Mary Ann Harris    b. about 1860 at Desborough
Birth: about 1879, at DesboroughCensus
Burial: 15 Dec 1954, aged 76y, at DesboroughNhants PRs

Pedigree
   3081
Married: Florence Jane Thorpe  1900BMD
b. about 1879, at DesboroughCensus

   87432.1 Frederick William Coemale
Birth: about May 1900, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 15 Sep 1901 at DesboroughIGI
Burial: 16 Sep 1904, aged 4y, at DesboroughNhants PRs

   169542.2 Archie Coemale
Birth: 1901, at DesboroughBMD
Baptism: 15 Sep 1901 at DesboroughIGI

   169592.3 Ronald Coemale
Birth: about 1904, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 12 Jun 1904 at DesboroughIGI

   169602.4 Mildred Coefemale
Birth: about 1907, at DesboroughCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page