You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Coe > Lydia Coe (1860 - )

Desborough People
Lydia Coe


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   2814 1.0 Lydia Coefemale
901 Father: John Coe   b. 14 Sep 1834 at Desborough   d. 07 Apr 1923
2809 Mother: Elizabeth Martin   b. about 1836 at Rothwell, Northamptonshire   d. about 1875
Birth: about 1860, at DesboroughCensus

Married: George Marlow  1881BMD
b. about 1860, at Rothwell, Northamptonshire  d. 22 Nov 1925, at Faire Hospital, Bond St, Leicester, Leicestershire, age: 66y

   47952.1 Ralph George Marlowmale
Birth: about 1883, at DesboroughCensus
Married: Ada Millicent Smith  1912BMD
b. about 1884, at Rothwell, Northamptonshire  d. 01 Oct 1916, at Desborough

   47962.2 Nellie Marlowfemale
Birth: about 1888, at DesboroughCensus

   92472.3 Luther Marlowmale
Birth: about 1893, at DesboroughCensus

   92482.4 Dorothy Marlowfemale
Birth: about 1898, at DesboroughCensus



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page