You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Panter > Arthur William Panter (1870 - )

Desborough People
Arthur William Panter


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   3379 1.0 Arthur William Panter   also known as William Pantermale
775 Father: Owen Panter    b. about 1847 at Desborough
1234 Mother: Mary Henrietta Fenton    b. about 1847
Birth: about 1870, at DesboroughCensus

Married: Frances Maud Mitchell  1891BMD
b. about 1872, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   97222.1 Mabel Elizabeth Panterfemale
Birth: about 1894, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 27 Dec 1894 at DesboroughIGI

   97232.2 Nellie Panterfemale
Birth: about 1896, at DesboroughCensus

   97242.3 Harry Pantermale
Birth: about 1899, at DesboroughCensus

   97252.4 Lawrence Pantermale
Birth: about May 1900, at DesboroughCensus

   172032.5 Kate Panterfemale
Birth: about 1906, at DesboroughCensus

   172042.6 Percy Pantermale
Birth: about 1909, at DesboroughCensus



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page