You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Coe > Eliza Coe (1860 - )

Desborough People
Eliza Coe

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   3613 1.0 Eliza Coefemale
1901 Father: Elisha Coe    b. about 1836 at Desborough
1931 Mother: Ann Martin    b. about 1839 at Desborough
Birth: about 1860, at DesboroughCensus

Pedigree
   4590
Married: Arthur Hornsby  1882BMD
b. about 1860, at Harborough, LeicestershireCensus

   47492.1 Frederick Levi Hornsby   also known as Levi Hornsbymale
Birth: about 1884, at DesboroughCensus
5285
Married: Minnie Esther Blissett  1904BMD
b. about 1885, at DesboroughCensus

   178393.1 Alice Hester Hornsbyfemale
Birth: about Jun 1904, at DesboroughMercury
Death: 05 Oct 1904 , at Desborough, age: 4mMercury

Additional Information: Inquest

   178643.2 Arthur Hornsbymale
Birth: about 1907, at DesboroughCensus

   178383.3 Leslie Hornsbymale
Birth: about 1909, at DesboroughCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page