You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Marlow > Robert Marlow (1754 - )

Desborough People
Robert Marlow

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   3707 1.0 Robert Marlowmale

Birth: before 1754Est. from marriage

Pedigree
   3708
Married: Alice Crick  at Desborough 14 Sep 1772 (marriage source reads: Robert Marlow and Alce Crick Both of this parish) Bp Transcripts Desb
bap. 18 Aug 1751 at Desborough (source reads 'Alce Daughter of John Crick and Susannah his wife') Bp Transcripts Desb

   127742.1 Mary Marlowfemale
Baptism: 06 Dec 1772 at Desborough (source reads 'Mary the Daughr of Robt and Alce Marlow') Bp Transcripts Desb

   37092.2 Elizabeth Marlowfemale
Baptism: 04 Apr 1774 at Desborough (source reads 'Elizth the Daughr of Robert and Alce Marlow') Bp Transcripts Desb

   37102.3 Thomas Marlowmale
Baptism: 05 May 1776 at Desborough (source reads 'Thos Son of Robert & Alice Marlow') Bp Transcripts Desb

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page