You are here: Desborough > Surnames > [not known] > Elizabeth [not known] (1690 - )

Desborough People
Elizabeth [not known]


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   3896 1.0 Elizabeth [not known]female

Birth: before 1690Est. from child

Married: Thomas Loake  before 1705Est. from child
b. before 1690Est. from child

   38972.1 Jane Loakefemale
Birth: 27 Nov 1705, at DesboroughIGI

   38982.2 Mary Loakefemale
Birth: 26 May 1708, at DesboroughIGI

   38992.3 Ann Loakefemale
Birth: 08 Sep 1710, at DesboroughIGI

   39002.4 Abigail Loakefemale
Birth: 02 Sep 1712, at DesboroughIGI

   39012.5 Thomas Loakemale
Baptism: 09 Jan 1715 at DesboroughIGI

   112142.6 John Loakemale
See also John Loake bapt 12 May 1721. Uncertain which John belongs to which Thomas and Elizabeth Loake
Birth: 17 Jan 1721 /22, at Desborough (source reads: Born John the Son of Thomas & Elizabeth Loake) Bp Transcripts Desb



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page