You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Loake > Thomas Loake (1834 - )

Desborough People
Thomas Loake


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   3967 1.0 Thomas Loakemale
249 Father: Thomas Loake    b. 09 Feb 1812 at Desborough
3966 Mother: Eliza Hillyard    b. about 1806 at Scaldwell, Northamptonshire
Baptism: 29 Jun 1834 at DesboroughIGI

Married: (1) Mary Light  1856BMD
b. about 1836, at Chertsey, SurreyCensus

   45672.1 Edith M Loakefemale
Birth: about 1858, at Oxford, OxfordshireCensus

   41592.2 Constance Eliza Loakefemale
Birth: about 1860, at Oxford, OxfordshireCensus

   41602.3 Thomas Loakemale
Birth: about 1862, at Oxford, OxfordshireCensus

   41612.4 Blanche Loakefemale
Birth: about 1864, at Oxford, OxfordshireCensus
Birth: about 1866, at Oxford, OxfordshireCensus
Birth: about 1870, at Stepney, LondonCensus

Married: (2) Annie Chamberlain  1888BMD
b. about 1863, at Bow, LondonCensus



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page