You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Coe > Abraham Coe (1844 - 1890)

Desborough People
Abraham Coe


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   4082 1.0 Abraham Coemale
4077 Father: William Coe    bap. 02 Dec 1804 at Desborough    bur. 27 Aug 1858 at Desborough
4078 Mother: Eliza [not known]    b. about 1816 at Desborough
Birth: about 1844, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 23 Jun 1844 at DesboroughIGI
Death: about 1890, age: 44yBMD

Married: Kezia March  1865BMD
b. about 1843, at Thrapstone, NorthamptonshireCensus

   168392.1 Mary E Coefemale
Birth: about 1868Census

   168402.2 Alice Maria Coefemale
Birth: May 1869, at Thrapstone, NorthamptonshireParish Reg
Baptism: 06 Oct 1869 at St Mary, Islington, LondonParish Reg

   168412.3 Nelly L Coefemale
Birth: 1876, at St Pancras, LondonCensus

   168422.4 Lily Coefemale
Birth: 1878, at St Pancras, LondonCensus

   168432.5 Percy William Coemale
Birth: 1880, at St Pancras, LondonBMD



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page