You are here: Desborough > Surnames > [not known] > Elizabeth [not known] (1616 - )

Desborough People
Elizabeth [not known]

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   4866 1.0 Elizabeth [not known]female

Birth: before 1616Est. from child

Pedigree
   4865
Married: John Panter  before 1634Est. from child
b. 17 Dec 1598, at Desborough (source reads: John s Thos Panter)  bur. 28 Mar 1670, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads: John Panter was buried aged 71)

   48672.1 Ellen Panterfemale
Baptism: 28 Oct 1634 at Desborough (source reads 'Ellen d John & Eliz Panter')Rec. Off. Trans.

   48682.2 Ann Panterfemale
Baptism: 19 Jul 1636 at DesboroughParish Reg

   48692.3 John Pantermale
Baptism: 18 Feb 1637/38 at Desborough (source reads 'John s John & Eliz Panter')Rec. Off. Trans.

   48702.4 William Pantermale
Baptism: 13 Dec 1640 at Desborough (source reads 'Wm s John & Eliz Panter')Rec. Off. Trans.

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page