You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Feakin > Samuel Feakin (1862 - )

Desborough People
Samuel Feakin

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   5067 1.0 Samuel Feakinmale
1000 Father: Daniel Feakin    b. about 1826 at Desborough
989 Mother: Harriet Manton    b. about 1826 at Desborough    d. 12 Nov 1903 at Desborough
Birth: about 1862, at DesboroughCensus

Pedigree
   5307
Married: Elizabeth Hickman  1886BMD
b. about 1862, at Easton Maudit, NorthamptonshireCensus

   53082.1 William Feakinmale
Birth: about 1887, at DesboroughCensus

   53092.2 Harriett Feakinfemale
Birth: about 1889, at DesboroughCensus

   53102.3 Daniel Feakinmale
Birth: about Jul 1890, at DesboroughCensus

   85712.4 Louisa Feakinfemale
Birth: about 1894, at DesboroughCensus

   85722.5 Charles Feakinmale
Birth: about 1896, at DesboroughCensus

   85732.6 James Feakinmale
Birth: about 1900, at DesboroughCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page