Desborough People
Dinah Cox
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
5210
1.0 Dinah Coxfemale
Birth: about 1839, at Harwell, Berkshire
CensusPedigree
883Married:
George Tailby
at London 11 Dec 1859
Mrg Cert
bap. 13 Sep 1829 at DesboroughIGI
Birth: about 1858, at St Pancras, LondonCensus
Birth: 08 Jan 1860
Parish Reg
Baptism: 19 Oct 1862 at Holy Trinity, Kentish Town, London
Parish Reg
Death: 1865, age: 5y
BMD
Birth: 1862, at Kentish Town, London
BMD24 Sep 1862, at Kentish Town, London
Parish Reg
Baptism: 19 Oct 1862 at Holy Trinity, Kentish Town, London
Parish Reg
Birth: 11 Aug 1864, at St Pancras, LondonParish Reg
Baptism: 11 Sep 1864 at St John the Baptist, Kentish Town, Camden, LondonParish Reg
Birth: 04 Sep 1871Parish Reg
Baptism: 01 Oct 1871 at St Andrew, Haverstock Hill, Camden, LondonParish Reg
Birth: 22 Nov 1874, at Kentish Town, LondonParish Reg
Baptism: 20 Dec 1874 at St Andrew, Haverstock Hill, Camden, LondonParish Reg
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page